Application-aware infrastructure
Our platform work sits close to PHP and Next.js applications, so deployment choices are made with the codebase in mind.
app-awareWe modernize the platform around web applications: Docker images, AWS ECS/ECR, deployment pipelines, monitoring, backups and the cleanup needed to make releases less fragile. The strongest proof is in PHP and Next.js platforms we already know how to run.
We choose boring, understandable infrastructure when that is enough. The goal is easier releases and fewer surprises.
Bottom line: Docker, AWS ECS/ECR, CI/CD, monitoring and documentation.
Our platform work sits close to PHP and Next.js applications, so deployment choices are made with the codebase in mind.
app-awareOne documented project moved from a complex Kubernetes setup to a simpler Dockerized AWS environment.
simplerMonitoring, backups, rollback paths and documentation matter as much as the initial migration.
operableContainerize the services, fix the deployment path, or clean up ongoing operations.
Bottom line: Docker implementation, CI/CD and monitoring/maintenance.
Create and improve Docker images for PHP, Next.js and Node.js services.
Make releases repeatable with pipelines and practical deployment tooling.
Keep the platform understandable after the migration.
These are the tools already present in existing service and case-study material.
We start by understanding the business problem and the existing code or infrastructure before we suggest a solution.
Bottom line: discovery, written plan, senior implementation, clean handover or ongoing care.
We review the goal, the current setup, and the business constraint. If the existing codebase is part of the work, we inspect it before promising a route.
You get a practical plan: what we will change, what we will leave alone, where the risks are, and what the first useful milestone looks like.
Implementation happens in pull requests, with code review and automated checks where the project supports them. We keep the work visible instead of disappearing into a black box.
After release, we either continue with maintenance and support, or hand over the code, deployment notes, and the decisions behind the implementation.
We work with transparent hourly or project-based pricing, depending on the engagement. The exact setup depends on the scope, risk, and whether you need a project, team augmentation, or ongoing maintenance.
Before development starts, we agree the first milestone and the expected effort. No agency theatre, no vague “we’ll see later” scope.
For larger or unclear work, we start with a discovery or audit so the estimate is based on your actual codebase and constraints.

“Fuse Web exists for companies that need senior engineering without turning the work into agency theatre. We keep the team small, the communication direct, and the technical choices tied to business value.”
We keep this to work we can tie back to existing services and case studies.
Yes. Existing case-study work includes Docker images for PHP and Next.js/Node.js services, AWS ECR/ECS deployments and Jenkins deployment automation.
No. In one documented case, the right move was simplifying a complex Kubernetes setup into Docker on AWS ECS. We choose the tool that makes the platform easier to operate.
Sometimes. The Docker/AWS case study reports a 30% service-cost reduction through more efficient autoscaling. We only claim savings after looking at the actual setup.
Yes. Monitoring, alerting, backup planning and recovery documentation are part of platform modernization work where needed.
No. We also improve deployment pipelines, Docker environments, CI/CD, monitoring and the operational setup around existing applications.
A short call with the founder. No sales deck — just a senior engineer's first take on the problem.